Site Registration | Find a Copy | Event Calendar | Site Map
The Voice of the Black Community


Report: Skin color tied to auto finance
Published Tuesday, February 6, 2018
by Charlene Crowell, NNPA

Nationwide, auto loans represent the third-highest category of consumer debt. And, according to new research, the color of your skin has a lot to do with how much debt is incurred.

Discrimination in Auto Lending, authored and published by the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA), found that despite federal laws banning credit discrimination by race or ethnicity, race remains a key factor in the cost of financing auto loans. 

According to the report, “This discrimination has undoubtedly played a part in creating the racial and ethnic wealth gaps and credit access disparities that exist in the U.S. today, and it will ensure that they persist if allowed to continue unchecked.”

Like secret shoppers, the NFHA sent eight teams of testers to dealerships to inquire about purchasing the same vehicle. Each team was told to ask the same questions and then report on their experiences. Seven of the teams were non-white and had both higher incomes and credit scores than that of the eighth and white tester. 

All testers encountered challenges to securing information needed to secure the best auto loan available. However, the non-white testers noted being treated disrespectfully and receiving a pricier quote for finance than the white testers. Numerically, the sum of experiences found:

  • Seventy-five percent of the time, white testers were offered more financing options than non-white testers.
  • Sixty-two percent of the time, non-white testers who were more qualified than their white counterparts received more costly pricing options
  • On average, non-white testers who experienced discrimination would have paid an average of $2,662.56 more over the life of the loan than less-qualified white testers.

“Such high rates of discriminatory treatment are alarming and extremely rare in similar audit-style investigations conducted in the mortgage lending industry,” the report states. “Although it has its bad actors, the mortgage lending industry has been regulated and monitored for civil rights violations for decades. It is imperative that auto lending regulations, particularly those that are designed to fight discrimination, are similarly robust and regularly enforced.”

Earlier research by the Center for Responsible Lending reached similar conclusions. A lack of transparency, dealer markups on interest financing, and practices known as “loan packing” and “yo-yo” scams have all been cited by CRL.

Loan packing is a term used to describe how dealerships steer consumers into bundling several services and/or products that effectively boost purchase and finance costs. Often, many consumers do not know that these products can often be purchased far cheaper if they were to secure them independently of the dealership.

Yo-yo scams in auto financing occur when a consumer drives a car off the dealer lot without finalizing its finance. Technically, if the loan paperwork has not been signed but the consumer has the use of the vehicle – especially overnight or longer – he unwittingly has taken delivery on the car. By the time the consumer returns, the dealership hikes the price of the vehicle and interest. At that point, the consumer has next to no opportunity to negotiate price or finance rates. If a trade-in of an older car is involved, dealerships often tell these kinds of customers that it has already been re-sold.

“Racial discrimination should not be tolerated with any financial product, which makes regulation especially important when the product is one of the most expensive investments a family will make,” CRL researcher Delvin Davis said.

In recent years, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found racial discrimination in interest rate markups, then sued and settled these issues with banks and financing arms of major auto manufacturers.  For example, Ally Financial and Ally Bank settled its lawsuit in 2013 for $98 million. In 2015, Honda’s settlement was $24 million and Toyota’s in 2016 was $21.9 million. 

The NFHA also likened auto discrimination to yet another more form of bias that burdens blacks and other consumers of color.

“Too often the people in this situation are people of color whose neighborhoods have been starved of investment and whose ability to move to neighborhoods that better connect them to opportunity has been constrained by discriminatory policies and practices. And too often, when they seek a loan to finance an auto purchase, they face discrimination again.”


Charlene Crowell is the Center for Responsible Lending’s communications deputy director. She can be reached at Charlene.crowell@responsiblelending.  



An excellent article on an unfortunate topic. This is more reason Black people have to vigilante about their economic future.
Posted on February 9, 2018

Leave a Comment

Send this page to a friend

Upcoming Events

read all

Freedom Train



Kaki King

Time: 8 to 10 p.m. Composer and guitarist Kaki


Project Alpha for Youth

Time: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Several local young males

Latest News

read all

Actor is fourth African-American to portray Phantom

At 6-foot-7 and almost 250 pounds, Quentin Oliver Lee makes an imposing character. But

Report Card

Whew! What a season it has been. Despite the obvious favorites, the CIAA Tournament should be

Durham Arts Council displays ‘America Wants’

DURHAM – Turning photos into powerful messages, Owens Daniels is using photography and